前《苹果日报》撰稿人黄安屹开庭受审：首名被控《维护国家安全条例》第 88 条“妨碍国安调查”者，两罪均不认罪Former Apple Daily writer Wong Kwok-ngon (Wong On-yin) stands trial: first person charged under Article 88 of the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance for 'obstructing' a national security investigation; pleads not guilty to both counts

🔊 听这篇报道🔊 Listen to this story 中文朗读 · 可转发给家人收听Read aloud in Chinese

71 岁的前《苹果日报》撰稿人、YouTube 时事评论员黄国安（笔名黄安屹）已在区域法院开庭受审。据纽约大学美亚法律研究所 10 月 11–17 日的一周法律动态（引述《香港自由新闻》），黄被控煽动罪及披露国安调查细节罪，是首名因披露国安调查细节被检控的人。检方指称，黄在两段视频中披露，国安警察曾于 2025 年 12 月在他计划就致命的宏福苑大火举行记者会当天，约他到警署“见面”；黄在庭上称，警员当时说不得透露会面“内容”，但从未说过不能提“见面”本身。[1]Wong Kwok-ngon, 71, a former Apple Daily writer and YouTube current-affairs commentator known by his pen name Wong On-yin, has gone on trial at the District Court. According to NYU's U.S.-Asia Law Institute weekly roundup for October 11–17 (citing Hong Kong Free Press), Wong is charged with sedition and with disclosing details of a national security investigation — the first person prosecuted for such a disclosure. Prosecutors say Wong revealed in two videos that national security police had called him to a meeting in December 2025 on the day he planned to speak at a news conference about the deadly Wang Fuk Court fire; Wong told the court that officers said he should not reveal what was said during the meeting, but never told him he could not mention the meeting itself. [1]

为什么重要WHY IT MATTERS

此案值得记录，有三个原因。其一，它是《维护国家安全条例》第 88 条“妨碍危害国家安全罪行调查”罪的首宗检控——该条文 2025 年 5 月才经附属法例增设，黄国安案将成为这条新罪名的第一个判例，决定“被国安警约谈后能否公开谈论此事”的边界。其二，被告的身份与抗辩具有标志性：71 岁的前《苹果日报》撰稿人，以“媒体工作者报道新闻”为由不认罪，把案件变成了“新闻工作 vs 国安保密”的直接对撞；保护记者委员会去年 12 月就此案发表声明，正是把它定性为记者骚扰案。其三，案件的导火索是宏福苑大火——香港数十年来最致命的火灾，围绕火灾救援的言论已导致至少五人被控煽动，黄案是其中最新一宗，显示灾难问责言论正被系统性纳入国安执法范围。需要保守对待的是：庭审仍在进行中，控辩双方对“警员当时到底说了什么”各执一词，本站未能旁听庭审；黄是否“蓄意”妨碍调查、其言论是否构成煽动，有待法庭裁决。故本记录定性为持续核实。[1][2][3]This case is worth recording for three reasons. First, it is the first prosecution under Article 88 of the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance — the offence of 'obstructing investigations into offences endangering national security', added via subsidiary legislation in May 2025 — making Wong's case the first case law on where the boundary lies between being called in by national security police and being allowed to talk about it publicly. Second, the defendant's identity and defence are emblematic: a 71-year-old former Apple Daily writer pleading not guilty on the grounds that he was reporting news as a media worker, turning the case into a direct collision between journalism and national-security secrecy; the Committee to Protect Journalists framed it as a journalist-harassment case in its December statement. Third, the trigger was the Wang Fuk Court fire — Hong Kong's deadliest fire in decades — with commentary on the fire's aftermath already leading to at least five sedition arrests, Wong's being the latest, showing disaster-accountability speech being systematically folded into national-security enforcement. A conservative note: the trial is ongoing, the prosecution and defence dispute what the officers actually said, and this site could not attend the proceedings; whether Wong 'deliberately' obstructed the investigation and whether his remarks constitute sedition await the court's ruling. Hence 'under ongoing verification'. [1][2][3]

详细记录Full report

据 USALI 一周法律动态：前《苹果日报》撰稿人黄国安（笔名黄安屹）在其 YouTube 频道评论时事，已因煽动罪及披露国安调查细节罪在区域法院开庭。他是首名因披露国安调查细节被检控的人。检方指称，黄在两段视频中披露，国安警察曾于 2025 年 12 月在他计划就致命的宏福苑大火举行记者会当天，约他到警署“见面”；黄在庭上回应称，警员当时表示不应透露会面期间“说了什么”，但从未告诉他不能提及“见面”本身。[1]

据庭审报道，黄安屹对两项控罪均不认罪。他承认发布了相关视频、披露了与国安警察的会面，但辩称其行为合法，因为他认为自己是以媒体工作者身份在报道新闻。据出庭作证的警司称，警方收到情报，指被告与另外几人计划就宏福苑大火举行记者会，意图“制造社会内部矛盾、危害国家安全”，因而在 2025 年 12 月 2 日约谈了他。[2]

案件背景：2025 年 12 月 2 日，黄国安被国安警带走问话，据报当时他签署了一份保密协议；随后他在 YouTube 上公开谈论此事。12 月 6 日，国安警以涉嫌“危害国家安全罪行的调查作出妨碍行为”及“作出具煽动意图的行为”拘捕 71 岁的黄国安，这是该“妨碍调查”罪名设立以来首次拘捕。12 月 9 日，裁判官拒绝其保释申请，还押候审。警方当时称需六周时间审查约 2400 段视频（多为 30 分钟以上）及 15 部被扣押电子设备。两罪每项最高可判七年监禁。保护记者委员会 2025 年 12 月 7 日发表声明，要求中国及香港当局立即停止骚扰记者、释放黄国安，允许媒体自由报道这场数十年来最致命的火灾。[2][3]

核实说明：本记录综合 USALI 一周法律动态（引述《香港自由新闻》）、庭审报道及保护记者委员会 2025 年 12 月声明。庭审仍在进行中，控辩双方对警员当时的口头指示内容各执一词，本站未能旁听庭审；“蓄意妨碍”与“煽动意图”的认定有待法庭裁决，中国及香港官方未就本案发表新的公开说明。故本记录定性为持续核实，将继续跟进判决结果。[1][2][3]

According to the USALI weekly roundup: Wong Kwok-ngon, a former Apple Daily writer who posts on his YouTube channel as Wong On-yin, went on trial at the District Court on charges of sedition and of disclosing details of a national security investigation — the first person prosecuted for such a disclosure. Prosecutors say Wong revealed in two videos that national security police had called him to a meeting in December 2025 on the day he planned to speak at a news conference about the deadly Wang Fuk Court fire. Wong told the court that officers said he should not reveal what was said during the meeting, but never told him he could not mention the meeting itself. [1]

According to trial reporting, Wong pleaded not guilty to both charges. He admitted to publishing the videos and disclosing his meeting with national security police, but argued his actions were lawful because he viewed himself as a media worker reporting on news. According to police testimony from a chief inspector, authorities received intelligence that the defendant and several other individuals planned to hold a press conference regarding the Wang Fuk Estate fire that was intended to 'generate internal social friction and endanger national security', which prompted the December 2, 2025 interview. [2]

Background: on December 2, 2025, Wong was taken in by national security police for questioning and reportedly signed a confidentiality agreement; he later discussed the matter publicly on YouTube. On December 6, national security police arrested the 71-year-old on suspicion of 'prejudicing the investigation of offences endangering national security' and 'doing an act with seditious intention' — the first arrest under the obstruction offence since its creation. On December 9, a magistrate denied bail and remanded him in custody. Police said at the time they needed six weeks to review approximately 2,400 videos (mostly over 30 minutes) and 15 seized devices. Each offence carries a maximum of seven years' imprisonment. The Committee to Protect Journalists issued a statement on December 7, 2025, demanding that Chinese and Hong Kong authorities immediately stop harassing journalists, release Wong Kwok-ngon, and allow the media to freely cover the city's deadliest fire in decades. [2][3]

Verification note: this record draws on the USALI weekly roundup (citing Hong Kong Free Press), trial reporting, and the Committee to Protect Journalists' December 2025 statement. The trial is ongoing, the two sides dispute what the officers said verbally, and this site could not attend the proceedings; findings on 'deliberate obstruction' and 'seditious intention' await the court's ruling, and Chinese and Hong Kong officials have issued no new public statements on the case. This record is therefore graded 'under ongoing verification' and will follow the verdict. [1][2][3]

核实来源

Primary sources

上述链接是所引用报告或评估的原始发布方。其结论已在正文中明确归属，不代表本站独立完成了全部事实认定。Links above point to the original publishers of the cited reports or assessments. Their conclusions are attributed in the text and do not imply that this site has independently verified every factual claim.