明证中国China Rights Record 独立证据与新闻档案Independent evidence desk
← 返回全部记录Back to all records
持续核实Developing / checking 劳动权利与表达自由Labor rights and freedom of expression
本站发布:2026-10-07 事件日期:2026-09-30Published: 2026-10-07 Event date: 2026-09-30

长期关注劳工权益的自媒体人冯睿(网名“小五”)传被拘留,所涉罪名不明Labor-rights blogger Feng Rui ("Xiao Wu") reported detained; alleged charge unknown

🔊 听这篇报道🔊 Listen to this story 中文朗读 · 可转发给家人收听Read aloud in Chinese

据中央社10月4日引述香港《明报》报道,长期关注中国劳工权益的自媒体人“小五”(本名冯睿)近日传出失联并被有关部门拘留。他经营的微信公众号“恰帕斯东风电视机”自9月14日起停止更新,此前发表的10万余字《2025年劳动权益事件》年度报告也遭删除。报道称外界证实他已与律师会见,但所涉罪名不明;官方尚未公开说明拘留的法律依据。Citing Hong Kong's Ming Pao, Taiwan's Central News Agency reported on October 4 that Feng Rui, known online as "Xiao Wu," a blogger long focused on Chinese labor rights, had gone missing and was believed detained by authorities. His WeChat public account "Chiapas Dongfeng TV" stopped updating on September 14, and his 100,000-plus-character annual report on 2025 labor-rights cases was deleted. The report says he has met with a lawyer, but the alleged charge is unknown; no official account of a legal basis has emerged.

为什么重要WHY IT MATTERS

连续多年记录劳动者处境的自媒体平台负责人若因劳权报道被拘留,直接涉及劳动权利、表达自由与网络信息管制。本案目前只有“传被拘留”的媒体报道,罪名与法律依据均未公开;后续发展将检验报道是否属实。If the operator of a platform that has documented workers' conditions for years was detained over labor-rights reporting, it directly implicates labor rights, freedom of expression and online information control. So far only media reports of a reported detention exist; no charge or legal basis has been made public. Further developments will test whether the reports hold.

详细记录Full report

更新(2026年10月19日):冯睿案的罪名指控、羁押地点与在押状况出现多项可交叉的新信息。据工劳网 10 月 14 日刊载的法律质询书(质询人叶懋功,质询对象为广州市公安局越秀分局)引述公开信息:冯睿 2026 年 9 月 14 日被越秀分局以涉嫌“寻衅滋事罪”刑事拘留,羁押于广州市越秀区看守所;警方调查询问主要围绕其公众号文章《2025年劳动权益事件盘点》展开;截至质询书发出之日,他已被羁押超过 30 日,家属未及时收到拘留通知,律师会见权未获保障——这一点与《明报》早前“已与律师会见”的说法存在出入,两份材料的时间点与信息来源不同,本站并列呈现、暂不裁断。另据维权网 10 月 13 日报道:自 9 月 17 日起,冯睿几乎每天都被提审,最多一天三次,十一假期期间提审仍未停止;他一度因肠胃疾病上吐下泻、浑身无力,需要搀扶才能上台阶,坐轮椅被推去讯问室;他还患有严重的颈椎病,不宜久坐。质询书从法律上质疑“寻衅滋事罪”构成要件,认为其盘点文章系对公开信息的整理汇编(引述 589 个不同来源),不具备该罪的客观行为与主观要件。以上均来自劳工与人权机构的单方材料,中国官方未就冯睿案发表公开说明,罪名指控本身有待司法程序认定,本站维持“持续核实”定性,并继续关注其健康与律师会见状况。[3][4]

据中央社10月4日引述香港《明报》报道,长期关注中国劳工权益的自媒体人“小五”(本名冯睿)近日传出失联并被有关部门拘留。他经营的微信公众号“恰帕斯东风电视机”自9月14日起停止更新,他此前发表的长达10万余字的《2025年劳动权益事件》年度报告也遭删除。报道称,外界证实他已与律师进行了会见,但“尚不清楚其可能涉嫌的具体罪名”。[1]

“恰帕斯东风电视机”长期为中国基层劳工与劳工权益发声,关注议题包括外卖骑手权益、高温劳动保护、白领竞业协议与农民工权益。平台2025年12月31日发表由志愿者团队完成的10万余字《2025年劳动权益事件》年度报告,这是该团队连续第五年记录各行各业劳动者的困境。冯睿9月30日传出失联,失联前该报告已被删除。[1][2]

需要指出的是,“被拘留”的说法目前来自《明报》的报道引述,“已与律师会见”也未见律师或家属的公开声明;中国官方尚未公开说明冯睿被拘留的具体法律依据。因此,本站无法独立确认拘留是否发生及所涉罪名,将本记录标为“持续核实”,并继续寻找家属、律师或官方渠道的可验证信息。[1][2]

Update (October 19, 2026): Several cross-checkable new details have emerged on the charges, detention location and custodial conditions in Feng Rui's case. According to a legal inquiry letter published by LaborInfo (工劳网) on October 14 — filed by Ye Maogong with the Yuexiu District branch of the Guangzhou Public Security Bureau and citing public information: Feng Rui was criminally detained on September 14, 2026 by the Yuexiu branch on suspicion of 'picking quarrels and provoking trouble', and is held at the Guangzhou Yuexiu District Detention Center; police questioning has focused mainly on his public-account article '2025 Labor Rights Events Roundup'; as of the letter's date he had been detained for over 30 days, his family had not promptly received a detention notice, and his lawyer's visitation rights had not been guaranteed — the last point differing from Ming Pao's earlier account that he had met with a lawyer; the two accounts come from different time points and sources, and this site presents both without adjudicating. Separately, Weiquanwang reported on October 13 that since September 17, Feng has been interrogated almost daily, up to three times in a single day, with interrogations continuing through the National Day holiday; at one point he suffered vomiting, diarrhea and extreme weakness from a gastrointestinal illness, needing support to climb stairs and being wheeled to the interrogation room; he also has severe cervical spondylosis making prolonged sitting inadvisable. The inquiry letter legally challenges the 'picking quarrels' charge, arguing the roundup was a compilation of public information (citing 589 distinct sources) lacking the objective-act and subjective-intent elements of the offense. All of the above comes from one-sided labor- and human-rights-organization materials; Chinese officials have issued no public statement on Feng's case, and the charge itself awaits determination through judicial proceedings — this record remains graded 'under ongoing verification', and this site will continue to follow his health and lawyer-access situation. [3][4]

Taiwan's Central News Agency reported on October 4, citing Hong Kong's Ming Pao, that Feng Rui — known online as "Xiao Wu," a self-media figure long focused on Chinese labor rights — had recently gone missing and was believed detained by the authorities. His WeChat public account "Chiapas Dongfeng TV" stopped updating on September 14, and his 100,000-plus-character annual report on 2025 labor-rights cases was deleted. The report says outsiders confirmed he had met with a lawyer, but that the specific charge he may face remains unknown.[1]

"Chiapas Dongfeng TV" has long spoken up for grassroots Chinese workers and labor rights, covering delivery-rider protections, heat-related labor safeguards, white-collar non-compete agreements and migrant-worker rights. On December 31, 2025 the platform published a 100,000-plus-character annual report on 2025 labor-rights cases completed by a volunteer team — the team's fifth consecutive year documenting workers' conditions across industries. Feng was reported missing on September 30; the report had been deleted before that.[1][2]

The reported detention comes from Ming Pao's reporting as relayed by CNA, and the claimed lawyer meeting has not been confirmed by any public statement from a lawyer or family member; Chinese officials have not publicly explained any legal basis for a detention. China Rights Record therefore cannot independently confirm that a detention occurred or what charge is involved. This record is classified as developing, and the site will keep looking for verifiable information from family, lawyers or official channels.[1][2]

上述链接是所引用报告或评估的原始发布方。其结论已在正文中明确归属,不代表本站独立完成了全部事实认定。The linked organization is the source of the cited report or assessment. Its conclusions are attributed above and are not presented as independent findings by this site.