欧洲议会通过对华关系报告：呼吁无条件释放政治犯，点名新疆、西藏与香港人权状况European Parliament adopts EU-China report: calls for unconditional release of political prisoners, flags Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong

更新（2026年10月12日）：香港观察（Hong Kong Watch）10 月 12 日发表分析，对欧洲议会 10 月 7 日通过对华关系建议表示欢迎，并强调报告的涉港条款：要求中方释放黎智英、戴耀廷、黄之锋、梁国雄、邹家成（Owen Chow）、邹幸彤（Chow Hang-tung）以及因国安法仍在押的“香港 47 人”案成员；在司法独立和言论自由完全恢复之前，暂停所有向香港的引渡安排。报告文本称，《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》依《中英联合声明》在香港具有法律约束力、优先于国安立法；自 2020 年国安法实施以来，香港的基本自由、法治与司法独立已经崩塌，“一国两制”被彻底违反。报告还援引 2025 年 7 月针对 19 名海外活动人士发出的通缉令，呼吁欧盟建立反跨境镇压的统一框架，并要求中方关闭在欧盟的所谓“海外警务站”。香港观察政策总监 Megan Khoo 就此发表评论。[5]需要说明的是：以上是倡导组织对议会投票的解读与评论；报告原文的政策立场以欧洲议会官方文本为准。本站维持“持续核实”定性。[5]

2026年10月7日（周三），欧洲议会以454票赞成、86票反对、110票弃权通过了对华关系建议报告，对象是欧盟其他机构。报告在人权部分要求：加强对华人权对话，并就镇压、强迫劳动以及在西藏和新疆的政策向中国施加压力；对《民族团结进步促进法》的通过表达“深切关切”，认为该法可能进一步把同化政策制度化；呼吁无条件释放政治犯。报告同时要求欧盟加强对网络攻击、外国干涉、间谍活动与混合威胁的防范。[1][2]

报告起草人、比利时复兴欧洲党团议员 Hilde Vautmans 称，这次投票是“欧洲对华政策的一个转折点”，并表示只要在安全、人权与价值观上的根本分歧持续存在，中国就仍是“系统性竞争对手”。欧洲议会同日还通过了配套的贸易与经济表述，要求贸易对等、公平竞争环境，并重申欧盟的一个中国政策，同时反对以武力或胁迫单方面改变台湾海峡现状。[1]

背景方面，欧洲议会与中国官方的直接接触在去年恢复，此前自2021年起基本冻结——当时中国政府因欧盟就人权问题制裁中国官员与机构，对多名欧洲议会议员实施了反制裁。2026年3月至6月，欧洲议会三个代表团曾访华，第四个代表团预计10月晚些时候成行。[1]

在同一周的联合国大会第三委员会一般性辩论期间，国际人权服务社（ISHR）发布的简报呼吁各国点名要求立即无条件释放因行使权利而被任意羁押的人士，其中点名了近期被判刑的香港支联会案人士邹幸彤、李卓人，以及高振、丁家喜、许志永和 Gulshan Abbas，并谴责跨境镇压与对人权捍卫者及其家属的报复行为（包括针对香港活动人士郭凤仪 Anna Kwok 的报复）。这些是倡导机构的呼吁内容，本站将其与欧洲议会的报告并列记录，供读者对照。[3]

核实说明：本记录记录的是“欧洲议会通过建议案”这一可核实的官方行为（欧洲议会官网新闻稿可查），报告原文的政策立场属于议会的政治表态。报告援引的新疆、西藏、香港具体侵权指控，本站尚未独立核实；ISHR 简报点名的个案中，邹幸彤、李卓人案本站已有记录（见“香港支联会案判刑”），其余个案有待进一步核实。因此本站将本记录标为“持续核实”，将继续跟进欧盟机构后续是否采纳该建议。[1][2][3]

更新（2026年10月9日）：澳门特区政府10月9日发表声明，对欧洲议会报告中涉及澳门首宗国家安全案件司法程序的批评表示“强烈反对和坚决谴责”，称有关言论“罔顾事实”、以双重标准看待澳门法治，强调案件审理依法进行、涉案嫌疑人的诉讼权利依法受到保障，并敦促欧洲议会立即停止干涉中国内政和澳门内部事务。这是澳门特区政府就该报告作出的公开回应。[4]

Update (October 12, 2026): Hong Kong Watch published an analysis on October 12 welcoming the European Parliament's October 7 adoption of recommendations on EU-China relations, highlighting the Hong Kong provisions: urging the PRC to free Jimmy Lai, Benny Tai, Joshua Wong, Leung Kwok-hung, Owen Chow, Chow Hang-tung and the members of the Hong Kong 47 who remain imprisoned under the National Security Law; and to suspend all extradition arrangements to Hong Kong until judicial independence and freedom of expression are fully restored. The text states that the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights is legally binding in Hong Kong under the Sino-British Joint Declaration and takes precedence over national security legislation; that fundamental freedoms, the rule of law and judicial independence in Hong Kong have collapsed since the National Security Law was imposed in 2020, and that the PRC has fully breached 'one country, two systems'. The recommendations cite the arrest warrants issued in July 2025 against 19 overseas-based activists, call for an EU-wide framework to counter transnational repression, and call on the PRC to close its so-called overseas police stations in the EU. Hong Kong Watch Policy Director Megan Khoo commented on the vote. [5]Note: the above is an advocacy organisation's reading and commentary on the parliamentary vote; the report's policy positions rest on the European Parliament's official text. This site maintains the 'under ongoing verification' grading. [5]

On Wednesday, October 7, 2026, the European Parliament adopted its recommendation on EU-China relations by 454 votes in favour, 86 against and 110 abstentions, addressed to the other EU institutions. On human rights, the report demands a reinforced human rights dialogue and pressure on China over repression, forced labour and policies in Tibet and Xinjiang; expresses "deep concern" over the adoption of the Law on Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress and its potential to further institutionalise assimilationist policies; and calls for the unconditional release of political prisoners. It also calls for stronger EU resilience against cyberattacks, foreign interference, espionage and hybrid threats. [1][2]

Rapporteur Hilde Vautmans (Renew, Belgium) called the vote "a turning point in Europe's China policy", adding that as long as fundamental differences on security, human rights and values persist, China will remain a "systemic rival". The Parliament reaffirmed the EU's One China policy while opposing any unilateral change to the status quo in the Taiwan Strait by force or coercion. [1]

On background: direct contacts between the European Parliament and Chinese authorities resumed last year after being effectively frozen since 2021, when the Chinese government imposed sanctions on several MEPs in response to the EU's human rights sanctions against Chinese officials and organisations. Three parliamentary delegations visited China between March and June 2026; a fourth is expected later in October 2026. [1]

In the same week, during the UN General Assembly Third Committee general debate, the International Service for Human Rights (ISHR) published a briefing urging States to call for the immediate and unconditional release of individuals arbitrarily detained for exercising their rights, naming recently convicted Hong Kong Tiananmen-vigil defendants Chow Hang-tung and Lee Cheuk-yan, as well as Gao Zhen, Ding Jiaxi, Xu Zhiyong and Gulshan Abbas, and condemning transnational repression and reprisals against defenders and their families, including against Hong Kong activist Anna Kwok. These are advocacy calls; this site records them alongside the Parliament's report for reference. [3]

Verification note: this record documents the verifiable official act — the European Parliament's adoption of the recommendation (published in its press room) — and the political positions stated in it. The specific abuse allegations in Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong cited by the report have not been independently verified by this site; of the individual cases named by ISHR, the Chow Hang-tung / Lee Cheuk-yan cases are already documented on this site (see the Tiananmen-vigil sentences record), while the remaining cases await further verification. The record is therefore marked "Developing / checking", and this site will follow whether the EU institutions act on the recommendation. [1][2][3]

Update (October 9, 2026): The Macao SAR Government issued a statement on October 9 expressing "strong opposition to, and resolute denunciation of" the European Parliament report's criticism of the judicial proceedings in Macao's first national security case. It called the remarks "unfounded" and an application of double standards toward Macao's rule of law, stressed that the case was adjudicated in accordance with the law and that the suspect's procedural rights were protected, and urged the European Parliament to immediately stop interfering in China's domestic affairs and Macao's internal affairs. This is the Macao SAR Government's public response to the report. [4]